Bespoke Tax Accountants

Specialist tax advice, accountancy and tax returns

01242 505970
info@bespoketax.com

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Meet The Team
    • Careers
    • Statutory Information
    • Privacy Policy
  • Who We Help
    • Personal and Family
    • Business
    • Our Clients
  • News
    • Making Tax Digital
  • Giving Back
  • Contact
  • Cloud Accounting
    • Xero

Payments made to son not a wage

27th February 2018 By bespoketax

A recent First-Tier Tribunal case examined whether a father’s payment of wages to his son was an allowable expense. We learn that the appellant in this case made a number of payments to his son whilst he was studying at university. HMRC questioned the validity of the appellants tax return and argued that any amounts paid by the appellant to his son must have been incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the appellant’s trade in order to be deductible against his self-employment income.

Following the provision of further information, HMRC allowed some expenses and by the time this case reached the Tribunal only the payment of wages to the appellant’s son of £7,400 was in dispute. We are told that the wages payment was based on 15 hours per week at £10 per hour for the ‘promotion of the business through internet and leaflet distribution and computer work’. The appellant was unable to demonstrate that his son had worked for the hours stated. In fact, on closer examination, HMRC were able to discern that the payments classified as wages included the provision of groceries and home insurance for his son and also cash totalling £1,850.

HMRC argued that the payments were not expended wholly and exclusively for business purposes but were dual purpose payments where all or part of the reason for the payments was out of a ‘natural parental love and affection’ and/or ‘personal benefit’. This meant that the payments were not incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the appellant’s trade. The court agreed with these assertions and the appellant’s appeal was dismissed.

Planning note

Interestingly, the Tribunal accepted that had the appellant paid his son using a time recorded basis or some other form of methodology that demonstrated the work was done then the claim could well have been successful. The key issue here was that the appellant was merely using his ‘work’ to make payments to his son without any valid reason.

Filed Under: Income Tax

Recent News

  • Tax Diary March/April 2021
  • Outcome of the Uber case
  • VAT Agricultural Flat Rate Scheme
  • Government to publish range of tax consultations

News Categories

  • Budget Summary
  • Business
  • Capital allowances
  • Capital Gains Tax
  • Construction Industry Scheme
  • Corporate Governance & Regulation
  • Corporation Tax
  • Duties
  • Employee Benefits
  • Employment & Payroll
  • Employment Law
  • Family Tax Credits
  • General
  • HMRC notices
  • Income Tax
  • Inheritance Tax
  • National Insurance
  • NIC & Pensions
  • Overseas personal tax issues
  • Overseas tax issues
  • Payroll
  • Pension
  • Personal
  • Practice News
  • Stamp Duty Land Tax
  • Tax credits
  • Tax Diary
  • Value Added Tax

About Us

Bespoke has a reputation for helping our clients make the most of their financial situations and in turn we have become a trusted extension of their business or family.

Bespoke assist with compliance requirements, providing specialist tax advice, and planning for now and the future.

Keep informed.
Sign up for our Topical Newsletter

Our FREE monthly newsletter will keep you up to date with the latest news related to the world of accountancy.

Register Here

Contact

Delta Place,
27 Bath Road, Cheltenham,
Gloucestershire, GL53 7TH
01242 505970
info@bespoketax.com

ICAEW Chartered AccountantsXERO Gold PartnerChartered Institute of TaxationMember of EISA

Copyright © 2021 · Bespoke Tax Accountants · Website by Culpepper & Co

.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.